Search found 3 matches

by FrederickJLaVergne
Sun Sep 09, 2012 10:32 pm
Forum: Section 10: Achieving the revolutionary vision
Topic: Connecticut Ratification found?
Replies: 12
Views: 29167

Re: Connecticut Ratification found?

Connecticut's were misfiled - and there is a potential reason for that in the brief. Kentucky's was in plain sight, but nobody was looking. Lots of nay-sayers, but 12 of the then 15 States means that that is a part of the Constitution, and can only be further changed by Amendment. Frederick John LaV...
by FrederickJLaVergne
Sun Sep 09, 2012 4:50 pm
Forum: Section 10: Achieving the revolutionary vision
Topic: Connecticut Ratification found?
Replies: 12
Views: 29167

Re: Connecticut Ratification found?

Court is the 14th, btw, in the Federal Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia. Initially, application was made by us (and denied) for an En Banc review. The opposition demanded Oral Arguments. Now that they've read our brief and response, they want to go back to a three judge panel and writt...
by FrederickJLaVergne
Sun Sep 09, 2012 4:43 pm
Forum: Section 10: Achieving the revolutionary vision
Topic: Connecticut Ratification found?
Replies: 12
Views: 29167

Re: Connecticut Ratification found?

Both Connecticut AND Kentucky were found. The suit is "LaVergne v Bryson, et al". You can view all of the documents in certified true copy form on NationalTruth.com. The opening page needs work. The documents speak for themselves. With Ct. and Ky, that's 12 of the then 15 States, or 80%. O...