Search found 209 matches
- Sun Jul 17, 2022 10:47 am
- Forum: Section 3: Take Control Away form the Special Interest groups
- Topic: A very wealthy Speaker of the House
- Replies: 0
- Views: 28
A very wealthy Speaker of the House
Washington Times: Pelosi’s husband buys $5 million in chip stocks before Senate vote on chip subsidy bill . "Mr. Pelosi purchased roughly $5 million, or 20,000 shares of Nvidia, last month ... The purchase comes on the heels of a vote next week ... that would shore up the U.S. computer chip man...
- Mon Jun 13, 2022 9:57 am
- Forum: Section 6: Enable political diversity in the House
- Topic: What about packing the House of Representatives?
- Replies: 0
- Views: 100
What about packing the House of Representatives?
In his article about our massively oversized congressional districts, Professor Swofford sums it up quite well: “ members of Congress tend to be more like other members of Congress rather than more like their constituents ”. That’s the problem: The Representatives rarely resemble their constituents!...
- Thu Jun 02, 2022 6:28 pm
- Forum: Section 7: Establish citizen equality nationwide
- Topic: What deviation of Citizen Political Weight is acceptable?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 108
Re: What deviation of Citizen Political Weight is acceptable?
My view is that in the absence of Article the first , Congress would be constitutionally compelled to select the House size that results in congressional district sizes with the least amount of variation in their sizes. This is explained here: Achieving One-Person-One-Vote equality in the federal Ho...
- Fri May 06, 2022 8:38 am
- Forum: Section 3: Take Control Away form the Special Interest groups
- Topic: Lobbyists raise over $1 billion in the first quarter of 2022
- Replies: 0
- Views: 107
- Wed Mar 16, 2022 3:22 pm
- Forum: Section 2: “Article the first” of the Bill of Rights
- Topic: Read about "Article the first"
- Replies: 0
- Views: 280
- Wed Mar 16, 2022 2:58 pm
- Forum: Section 7: Establish citizen equality nationwide
- Topic: Paper: One Person, One Vote, 435 Seats
- Replies: 0
- Views: 255
Paper: One Person, One Vote, 435 Seats
I just stumbled across this paper from 2011: One Person, One Vote, 435 Seats: Interstate Malapportionment and Constitutional Requirements Is Our Constitutional Order Broken - Structural and Doctrinal Questions in Constitutional Law: Gerrymandering, Congressional Representation, and Trust in the Poli...
- Mon Mar 14, 2022 10:50 pm
- Forum: Repealing the 17th Amendment: Pros and Cons
- Topic: Article: Ben Sasse Calls for Repealing the 17th
- Replies: 0
- Views: 227
Article: Ben Sasse Calls for Repealing the 17th
National Review: Ben Sasse Calls for Repealing 17th Amendment, Eliminating Popular-Vote Senate Elections (September 2020)
- Mon Mar 14, 2022 10:42 pm
- Forum: Section 9: The House of Representatives is Scalable
- Topic: Article: Proxy voting turns one
- Replies: 0
- Views: 254
Article: Proxy voting turns one
Brookings.edu : Proxy voting turns one: The past, present and future of remote voting in the House (May 2021) "Alongside these uses of proxy voting as a workplace accommodation are several examples where members of both parties cast votes by proxy but were reported to be engaging in other acti...
- Mon Mar 14, 2022 10:29 pm
- Forum: Section 8: Restore liberty and federal fiscal responsibility
- Topic: Article: U.S. National Debt Surpasses $30 Trillion: What This Means For You
- Replies: 0
- Views: 255
Article: U.S. National Debt Surpasses $30 Trillion: What This Means For You
Forbes.com: U.S. National Debt Surpasses $30 Trillion: What This Means For You (Feb 2022)
"But as unfathomable as this number is, the national debt can impact ordinary Americans’ lives."
"But as unfathomable as this number is, the national debt can impact ordinary Americans’ lives."
- Mon Mar 14, 2022 10:17 pm
- Forum: Section 6: Enable political diversity in the House
- Topic: Article: Racial and gender diversity in the 117th Congress
- Replies: 0
- Views: 209
Article: Racial and gender diversity in the 117th Congress
OpenSecrets.org: Racial and gender diversity in the 117th Congress (June 2020)
The reason for insufficient diversity: "the sky-high reelection rate of members of Congress".
The reason for insufficient diversity: "the sky-high reelection rate of members of Congress".
- Mon Mar 14, 2022 10:10 pm
- Forum: Section 6: Enable political diversity in the House
- Topic: Article: How Diverse is U.S. Congress?
- Replies: 0
- Views: 172
- Mon Mar 14, 2022 10:04 pm
- Forum: Section 5: Eliminate gerrymandering to achieve true representation
- Topic: Article: Republicans Discover the Horror of Gerrymandering
- Replies: 0
- Views: 256
Article: Republicans Discover the Horror of Gerrymandering
The Atlantic: Republicans Discover the Horror of Gerrymandering (February 2022)
"The GOP learns what it’s like to be on the losing side of a redistricting power grab."
"The GOP learns what it’s like to be on the losing side of a redistricting power grab."
- Mon Mar 14, 2022 10:00 pm
- Forum: Section 5: Eliminate gerrymandering to achieve true representation
- Topic: Article: How Partisan Gerrymandering Limits Voting Rights
- Replies: 0
- Views: 186
Article: How Partisan Gerrymandering Limits Voting Rights
AmericanProgress.org : How Partisan Gerrymandering Limits Voting Rights (July 2020) "Districts should be drawn so that people who have been underrepresented throughout American history — such as African American, Latinx, and other communities of color — are fully represented in Congress and st...
- Mon Mar 14, 2022 9:53 pm
- Forum: Section 5: Eliminate gerrymandering to achieve true representation
- Topic: Article: The Impact of Partisan Gerrymandering
- Replies: 0
- Views: 171
Article: The Impact of Partisan Gerrymandering
AmericanProgress.org: The Impact of Partisan Gerrymandering (Oct 2019)
"The impacts of gerrymandering are comparable to switching the majority of votes in 22 states."
"The impacts of gerrymandering are comparable to switching the majority of votes in 22 states."
- Mon Mar 14, 2022 9:46 pm
- Forum: Section 4: Overcome the incumbency advantage
- Topic: Low approval ratings and high reelection rates
- Replies: 0
- Views: 254
- Mon Mar 14, 2022 9:30 pm
- Forum: Section 3: Take Control Away form the Special Interest groups
- Topic: Insider Trading on Russia's war against Ukraine
- Replies: 0
- Views: 232
Insider Trading on Russia's war against Ukraine
It appears that both Democratic and Republican Congress members have profited from insider trading ahead of the Russia-Ukraine war, according to this report from Jesse Watters, who observes that "It doesn't matter what party you belong to, the role of the People's House is to protect us, not me...
- Mon Oct 07, 2013 1:52 pm
- Forum: Section 2: “Article the first” of the Bill of Rights
- Topic: Continuing the Pattern in Article the First
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3840
Re: Continuing the Pattern in Article the First
... I recently decided to see what the House size would be based on each U.S. census if the same proposed pattern in Article the First were continued... Given your analysis and interest in math, you will want to download & read " The Minimum and Maximum Size of the U. S. House of Represent...
- Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:14 am
- Forum: Section 10: Achieving the revolutionary vision
- Topic: Broaden our base
- Replies: 9
- Views: 17864
Re: Broaden our base
Have you heard of petitions.whitehouse.gov. Dave, supporters have posted petitions at Whitehouse.gov - for example this one , there may be more. (Their site has apparently been turned off during this government "shutdown".) Also, see the posting in this forum about another petition. I bel...
- Sat Oct 05, 2013 8:58 am
- Forum: Section 10: Achieving the revolutionary vision
- Topic: Connecticut Ratification found?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 24237
Re: Connecticut Ratification found?
There is a petition to sign now. It's at MoveOn.org.... isn't that a liberal website? I consider myself a conservative, but this cause is definitely cross-parties. I just signed that petition. Thank you for letting us know about it. You are correct: Representational enlargement is a truly non-parti...
- Sun Jul 07, 2013 5:56 pm
- Forum: Section 10: Achieving the revolutionary vision
- Topic: 3rd Chamber of Citizens
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7203
Re: 3rd Chamber of Citizens
Unfortunately, far too few people are even aware of the problem of oversized congressional districts and the oligarchy of 435, let alone the solution (as intended by "Article the first" of the Bill of Rights). With so few people who understand the problem or the solution, we are a long way...
- Sun Mar 03, 2013 9:14 am
- Forum: Section 10: Achieving the revolutionary vision
- Topic: A book. We need a book.
- Replies: 17
- Views: 35101
Re: No Book
Douglas,I appreciate your comments. we might seek out a gifted cartoonist or animator to tell the story. Explaining the need for smaller congressional districts, as well as the fascinating history of Article the first , could best be done via a series of compelling short videos that have the qualiti...
- Sun Mar 03, 2013 8:29 am
- Forum: Section 10: Achieving the revolutionary vision
- Topic: Connecticut Ratification found?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 24237
Re: Connecticut Ratification found?
Apparently the Supreme Court refused to receive the case. That is disappointing. Regretfully, I did not delve into this particular case as I wanted to, but I will when I can. I do want to understand the CT ratification and the other assertions made. SCOTUS did the same thing in Clemons et al. v. U....
- Sat Mar 02, 2013 3:30 pm
- Forum: Section 10: Achieving the revolutionary vision
- Topic: Getting Past the Mental Blocks
- Replies: 9
- Views: 11394
Re: Getting Past the Mental Blocks
Talk has been made of not "housing" the body in one central place. 3. I would like to know how this large body will not end up entangled in argument? They are "entangled in argument" now. They would be entangled in argument if there were only 100 of them (see the Senate). That i...
- Sat Mar 02, 2013 2:54 pm
- Forum: Repealing the 17th Amendment: Pros and Cons
- Topic: Repealing the 17th amendment
- Replies: 31
- Views: 50622
Re: Repealing the 17th amendment
What about continuing to allow the citizens to vote for their Senators, and removing the corruptive MONEY from public elections? Public Offices should not be for PRIVATE gain. Money will never be removed from the process. There is no way to eliminate money without eliminating freedom of speech - SC...
- Sat Mar 02, 2013 2:28 pm
- Forum: Take it outside!
- Topic: Bill of Rights for Voter Equality
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4319
Re: Bill of Rights for Voter Equality
Marcia, I moved this topic to start its own thread. As you know, some of those proposals I agree with, and some I do not. And some of the ones I agree with can probably be better implemented through legislation rather than a constitutional amendment. I don't want to get into specifics, other than to...