Read Section Seven of Thirty-Thousand.org.
Forum rules
Before posting, be sure to read Section Seven: Establish Citizen Equality Nationwide. Discussion is limited to that topic. All other discussion will be moved or deleted. No incivility or partisan advocacy allowed.
Post Reply
StriderV
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 2:03 pm
First Name: Patrick
Stance: Pro-Enlargement

What deviation of Citizen Political Weight is acceptable?

Post by StriderV »

Throughout this section, you state the various percentages of states that have either high or low "Citizen Weight" and that that is unacceptable.
I agree with all of these examples.

But my question is, how much is acceptable?

I ask, because even if we increase the number of representatives to 11,000 (and meet the 30,000 representation rate) we will STILL have some states with higher or lower citizen weight. Just, rather than being +28.7% to -30.2%, it would be +1.9% to -1.0%.

So, what should we be shooting for if we're using this as a criteria? Is there any legal precedent?
User avatar
JEQuidam
Posts: 209
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 8:45 pm
First Name: Jeff
Stance: Pro-Enlargement
Location: Dunwoody, Georgia
Contact:

Re: What deviation of Citizen Political Weight is acceptable?

Post by JEQuidam »

My view is that in the absence of Article the first, Congress would be constitutionally compelled to select the House size that results in congressional district sizes with the least amount of variation in their sizes. This is explained here:
Achieving One-Person-One-Vote equality in the federal House

However, if the intended version of Article the first were ratified, then any House size between 1:50,000 and 1:30,000 should be considered constitutional, IMO.
Post Reply